<p>In first-time experiments in the wild, a researcher at Brown University has discovered that a species of bat in Madagascar, <em>Myzopoda aurita,</em> uses wet adhesion to attach itself to surfaces. The finding explains why the bat — unlike almost all others — roosts head-up. It also helps to explain how it differs from a similar head-up roosting species. Results appear in the <em>Biological Journal of the Linnean Society.</em></p>

PROVIDENCE, R.I. [Brown University] — There are approximately 1,200 species of bats worldwide. Of that total, only six  are known to roost with their heads pointed upward. Investigators did not know why, because they knew next to nothing about one key group.

The sucker-footed bats of Madagascar, Myzopoda aurita, had rarely been seen in the wild and were listed as vulnerable to extinction by the International Union for Conservation of Nature. But several years ago, biologists stumbled upon some colonies in a new-growth forest on the southeastern section of the island, opening the door to studies.

Daniel Riskin, a postdoctoral research associate in ecology and evolutionary biology at Brown University, traveled last summer to Madagascar to study one of the two species of sucker-footed bats with biologist Paul Racey. In first-time experiments in the wild, the pair made a surprising discovery: The bats don’t use suction after all. Instead, they use wet adhesion, secreting a fluid, possibly sweat, that enables the pads on the bats’ wrists and ankles to attach to surfaces. The pair’s findings are published in the Biological Journal of the Linnean Society.

While the finding settles the question of how the bats roost, it means science has misnamed the bat. “Myzopoda literally means ‘sucker foot,’” Riskin, the paper’s lead author, said. “You can’t change Latin names, so it’s stuck with it.”

Riskin used a force plate he had built to determine how Myzopoda clung to surfaces. He placed the sucker-footed bats on the plates, first with evenly spaced holes and then with the holes covered by tape underneath the plate. In both instances, Myzopoda had no problem adhering to the plate, effectively ruling out suction as the adhesive technique. (Had suction been used, the holes would have prevented the bats from establishing a seal on the surface.)

Next, Riskin sought to understand how the bats roost head-up by testing how they detach their limbs from a surface. Holding the bat so it was head up-and in a vertical position, Riskin discovered that he could easily “unpeel” the bats’ pads from the surface. He also encountered little resistance when pushing the bat in an upward direction. But when Riskin tried to drag the bat downward (video clip, right), the animal clung doggedly to the vertical surface. Through further investigation, Riskin figured out the bats detach themselves from their roosting position by using tendons in their wrists and ankles to decrease the pads’ surface area of attachment. This explains why video footage shows the bats' pads peeling off the surface when they begin walking. It also explains why the bats would come unlatched if they tried to roost head down.

The finding helps scientists understand how Myzopoda lives in the wild. The bat, a small creature about two inches long and weighing one-third of an ounce, roosts on the slick surface of broad, fan-like leaves located high off the ground in an indigenous tree called Travelers’ Palm (Ravenala madagascariensis).

Daniel Riskin:
Daniel Riskin
The researchers’ finding also settles speculation that Myzopoda differs from its head-up roosting alter ego, Thyroptera, which is a suction-footed species that lives in tropical climes in Central and South America. The question is, with two species living in similar tropical environments under similar competitive pressures, which adhesive technique came first?

Riskin believes that Thyroptera is a later stage of evolution of the two bats. Why? While Myzopoda, through wet adhesion, can only roost head-up, Thyroptera, using suction, can roost either head-up or head-down. In terms of evolution, Riskin noted, “It doesn’t make sense to go through suction to get to wet adhesion, but it does make sense to go through wet adhesion to get to suction.”

The research was funded by the National Geographic Society and a private family donation.